Quiz+ | Quiz 1: The Anthropological Study Of Religion

An anthropological approach using multiple methods to gather information from multiple perspectives creates a more holistic picture of the phenomena under study. For example, using participant observation following interviews or focus groups allows evaluators to conduct a type of validation—observing independently whether participantsWhich of the following characteristics uniquely defines the anthropological approach? a holistic approach. Which of the following is not a primary perspective of anthropology? an ethnocentric perspective. Anthropological studies help us trace human connectedness; for example, in exploitative eastern Congolese mines they extract coltan, which wewhich of the following characteristics uniquely defines the anthropological approach? a. a concern with the study of humans b. a focus on human relationships and society c. a holistic perspective d. a focus on humans as biological organismsAll of the following are characteristics of the study of biological anthropology except: Which of the following best describes the Human Relations Area Files (HRAF)? a cross-cultural database Which of the following characteristics uniquely defines the anthropological approach? a holistic perspective.Which of the following characteristics uniquely defines the anthropological approach? a holistic perspective Note: the following do not uniquely define the anthropological app:-a concern with the study of humans-a focus on human relationships and society The following are perspectives of anthropology:-a holistic perspective

Anthropology Final Test #1 Flashcards | Quizlet

Which of the following is defined as the anthropological approach that views society as consisting of various parts that fit together with each part having its unique function within the larger1. Which of the following characteristics uniquely defines the anthropological approach? A. a concern with the study of humans B. a focus on human relationships and society C. a focus on humans as biological organisms D. a holistic perspectiveA cross-cultural or comparative approach is central to anthropological understanding. This emphasis also makes anthropology unique among the social sciences. Unlike sociologists, psychologists, economists and political scientists, anthropologists look beyond the confines of our own society and compare it to the beliefs and practices of otherCulture is considered anthropology's most distinguishing feature for all of the following reasons except: a. The focus on culture intersects with biology, material remains, social behavior, and language.

which of the following characteristics uniquely defines

Question: Binocul A, True B. False Ar And Stereoscopic Vision Developed As A Response To Arboreal Life 30. Tree-living Primates Have An Acute Sense Of Touch. Tru B, Fal Multiple Choice 1. Which Of The Following Characteristics Uniquely Defines The Anthropological Approach?The study of anthropology examines human cultures from the beginning of human history to the present as well as their social or community interactions. According to the University of Idaho, the five main characteristics of anthropology are culture, holistic approach, field work, multiply theories and purposes of anthropology.Distinguishing Characteristics of Anthropology. Every human society, each and everyone of us, has certain endemic "unresolved issues."In the very fact that we possess such questions helps define our nature as human beings, as there are no other species or beings in existence that are so burdened - (why we are left with these unanswered questions perhaps relates to the first set of questionsThe first anthropological definition of culture comes from 19th-century British anthropologist Edward Tylor: Culture…is that complex whole which includes knowledge, belief, art, law, morals, custom, and any other capabilities and habits acquired by man as a member of society (Tylor 1920 [1871]: 1).1. Which of the following is characteristic of qualitative research? a. Generalization to the population b. Random sampling c. Unique case orientation d. Standardized tests and measures 2. Phenomenology has its disciplinary origins in: a. Philosophy b. Anthropology c. Sociology d. Many disciplines 3. The primary data analysis approach in

The Anthropological Perspective: What Makes It Unique?

The concept of culture is anthropology's key idea. Besides the culture concept, then again, anthropology additionally has more than a few different unique tactics of eager about the international or about human cultures and societies. Of path that is true of any academic self-discipline, every of which is guided via positive models or premises concerning the global and how it approaches the phenomena it studies.

I want to speak about 4 major perspectives, each of which don't seem to be only central to the discipline of anthropology, but additionally make it unique amongst the social sciences. These come with its: cross-cultural or comparative emphasis, its evolutionary/historic emphasis, its ecological emphasis and its holistic emphasis.

1. A cross-cultural or comparative approach is central to anthropological understanding. This emphasis also makes anthropology distinctive among the social sciences. Unlike sociologists, psychologists, economists and political scientists, anthropologists glance past the confines of our personal society and examine it to the beliefs and practices of different societies, previous and provide. Where a sociologist, as an instance, may try to explain social organization with regard best to their very own society, an anthropologist would nearly invariably move on to check and contrast our own patterns of social group with different societies.

This comparative emphasis is vital. It helps anthropologists to keep away from equating "human nature," for example, with the peculiarities of our personal fresh society. Quite merely, simply because we all take some trust or taste of conduct without any consideration in the present, does not mean human beings in all places, or all through human history, would have agreed. As John Bodley (1999) puts it, an exam of the huge diversity of different societies encourages anthropologists "to view their very own culture thru an outsider's eyes." In different words, learning other cultures with very other understandings of the international, very other customs and kinds of life, ends up in what anthropologists refer to as "defamiliarization."

Defamiliarization refers to the process via which you increase an ability to have a look at our personal tradition as though it have been a overseas culture thru the learn about of other societies. That is, extensive cross-cultural learn about lets in one to assume more severely about one's personal tradition, and to understand that many aspects of one's own beliefs or ways of doing things, which we all take with no consideration on a daily basis, are in reality now not most effective utterly arbitrary, but in addition a ways from common throughout human historical past, and even in the present day in lots of instances.

Many others of our practices or beliefs are in reality very fresh phenomena. This is something which is reemphasized via anthropology's 2nd emphasis.

2. The 2d major emphasis which is unique of anthropology as a social science is its evolutionary/historic approach. This approach, coming from archeology and physical anthropology, focuses upon each the biological and cultural evolution of human beings and of human societies. It is also one of the the reason why a four subfields approach is so vital to the discipline as a complete.

An evolutionary/historical approach is "diachronic." In other phrases, it's centered upon the working out of and outline of patterns of change over the years. This approach supplies time intensity to an anthropological standpoint which, together with its cross-cultural emphasis, helps to position fresh society and fresh patterns of social building into an historic context.

The 3rd and fourth major emphases which are distinctive of anthropology as a social science-which are very carefully similar to one another-are its focal point upon:

3. an ecological approach, which views human societies or cultures inside of the context of larger herbal programs and,

4. an holistic approach, which may be very closely related to an ecological approach philosophically.

In reality, anthropology used to be the first social science to start to incorporate ecological insights into its research of human habits and society. Ecology has been phase of the self-discipline at least since the 1960s. Anthropology additionally remains the simplest social science which continues to incorporate ecology in an important and integral manner (even supposing all anthropologists wouldn't agree that we will have to be ecological). So if you are interested in learning about how socio-cultural techniques /interact/ with herbal or ecological systems, anthropology has the longest history of finding out this problem.

The explanation why so many anthropologists are also ecologists is not difficult to understand. The easy reason is that, as sciences, both ecology and anthropology are "holistic."

As a philosophical theory, "holism" merely refers to the assumption that no complex entity will also be thought to be to be not more than the sum of its portions. Holism in anthropology, then, is the assumption that any given aspect of human existence is to be studied with an eye to the approach it's /comparable/ to other sides of human lifestyles. In different phrases, holism is a synonym for a relational emphasis; an emphasis upon finding out the /relationships/ among all sides of culture-rather than "complete" cultures.

Anthropology's holistic emphasis may be the main reason that it was the social science that the majority readily adopted an ecological approach. After all, ecology defines itself as the find out about of the /relationships/ among dwelling organisms, and between residing organisms and the inorganic setting. A holistic and anthropological approach merely takes the identical premise, and applies it to the study of humanity and human societies.

Of direction, anthropology doesn't focal point only upon the relationships between human societies and their organic and inorganic environments, but additionally upon the social family members among the individuals of societies, the relationships between societies, and the relationships between more than a few sides of tradition. For example, the relationships between explicit patterns of subsistence, specific applied sciences, explicit economic and political systems, and explicit ideologies, or patterns of trust.

From an anthropological point of view, those various systems aren't simplest /related/ to each other, they are additionally noticed as /built-in/ with one another. In different words, all of the more than a few cultural establishments or programs more-or-less have compatibility with one one other, or mutually fortify one another (with a reasonable level of struggle admittedly inherent in lots of social methods).

Thus, following a relational understanding of holism and ecology, what we're studying is the relationships between things, somewhat than dividing them up into bits for separate learn about. And it is a premise which each ecology and anthropology proportion, which would possibly give an explanation for why anthropology is the social science which has made the most use of an ecological approach. Because of the self-discipline's holistic or relational emphasis, anthropologists had been, in a way, "pre-adapted" to an ecological approach at a theoretical level, even ahead of ecological problems started to become important.

There has, then again, been a basic trend against /specialization/ within different disciplines, ever since the creation of modern science. The development has been in opposition to narrowly centered disciplines in which mavens end up understanding "an increasing number of about less and no more," as the pronouncing goes.

Anthropology dollars this pattern. As does ecology. This is as a result of both anthropologists and ecologists are /generalists/ rather than experts. Indeed, even when anthropologists find out about any particular side of culture-such as political methods for example-we are at all times having a look at the way they are /comparable/ to other aspects of culture.

In truth, the holistic and ecological emphasis of much fresh anthropology can simplest make the self-discipline's insights increasingly related as ecological issues proceed to become more essential in contemporary society.

References, additional readings:

John H. Bodley (1999) "Victims of Progress," Mayfield Publishing Company.

Richard H. Robbins (2005) "Global Problems and the Culture of Capitalism," Pearson.